Sunday, April 26, 2026

Most Read of the Week

spot_img

Latest Articles

Gender, Body, and Power: A Reading Through Freud and Horney

One of the most influential figures in early attempts to explain human development in the history of psychology was Sigmund Freud. Freud’s psychoanalytic theory views childhood as the primary determinant of personality and explains sexual development through a series of stages. One of the most controversial concepts within this framework is “penis envy.”

According to Freud, children begin to notice bodily differences between the ages of approximately 3 and 6, during what he calls the phallic stage. At this stage, a young girl may observe that boys have a penis and perceive its absence in her own body as a deficiency. Freud interpreted this as a natural part of psychosexual development, suggesting that this awareness could influence the girl’s relationships with her parents and the formation of her identity.

Feminist Critique Of The Phallic Stage

However, from the perspective of feminist psychology, this approach is highly problematic. Defining the female body in terms of “lack” reflects not a biological reality, but a historically male-centered viewpoint. Feminist psychology criticizes Freud on this point, arguing that female development should be understood as an independent experience in its own right, rather than in comparison to men.

One of the most prominent critics in this regard is Karen Horney. Challenging Freud’s tendency to position women as “incomplete men,” Horney developed a powerful alternative perspective within psychoanalysis. Born in 1885, this German-American psychoanalyst was trained within the psychoanalytic tradition but significantly transformed it through her work on female psychology.

The Concept Of Womb Envy

According to Horney, Freud’s theory mistakenly presents male experience as the universal human experience. In response to “penis envy,” she introduced the concept of “womb envy.” She argued that some men may, at an unconscious level, develop feelings of inadequacy toward women’s capacity to bear children, become pregnant, and create life.

This envy is not expressed directly as a conscious desire, but rather emerges as a psychological tension manifested through indirect behaviors. For example, men may exhibit:

  1. An intense drive for achievement and productivity: Men may attempt to fulfill a need to create through work, science, or art. Symbolically, this becomes a form of “producing” in place of “giving birth.”

  2. Discourses that belittle women: Women may be socially oppressed and their roles diminished. Horney notably argues that “what is envied is often devalued.”

  3. A need for control: A desire to exert control over women’s bodies and reproductive capacities, reinforced through social norms and pressures on gender roles.

Power Dynamics and Social Construction

Horney interprets these patterns within this broader psychological framework. From this perspective, the marginalization of women in society is not merely a cultural tradition but may also reflect underlying dynamics of power and control. The need for control becomes a crucial point of analysis here. Social regulation over women’s bodies and reproductive capacities is not only biological but also ideological.

The prescription of how women should behave through gender roles can be understood, from a feminist standpoint, as part of broader power relations. For instance, generalizations such as “women are naturally emotional” are not merely personal opinions; they can also function as discourses that limit women’s rationality, decision-making power, and social position.

The debate between Freud and Horney ultimately points to a broader question: Is human psychology truly shaped by biological deficiencies, or is the very idea of “deficiency” socially constructed? The feminist perspective offers a clear direction: Women are not “lacking,” but rather individuals whose experiences have historically been rendered invisible and interpreted through male-centered theories. Therefore, the issue today is not only about concepts like “envy,” but about understanding the power relations within which these concepts are produced.

Bibliography

Bayne, E. (2011, March). Womb envy: The cause of misogyny and even male achievement?. In Women’s Studies International Forum (Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 151-160). Pergamon.

Britannica Editors (2025, November 30). Karen Horney. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Karen-Horney

Burger, J.M. (2006). Psikanalitik yaklaşım: Freudçu kuram, uygulama ve değerlendirme. Kişilik (1.Basım) içinde (171-176). (İ.D. Erguvan-Sarıoğlu, Trans.). İstanbul: Kaknüs Yayınları.

Paris, B. J. Karen Horney: a psychoanalyst’s search. Chapter 10. The masculinity complex.

Paris, B. J. Karen Horney: a psychoanalyst’s search. Part 2. The Freudian phase and feminine psychology.

Defne Duru DEDE
Defne Duru DEDE
Defne Duru Dede is a psychology student at Swansea University in the United Kingdom. She examines psychological phenomena through the lenses of mythology, theology, and historical contexts. In her writing, she focuses on relationships, clinical psychology, social and biological psychology, neurodevelopmental differences, anxiety, stress, depression, as well as dreams and unconscious processes. She received a Commendation Award in Theology at the John Locke Essay Competition, world’s most prestigious academic essay competition, organized by the University of Oxford and Princeton University. Through her interdisciplinary approach, she aims to explore human behavior in a multidimensional manner.

Popular Articles