Tuesday, December 16, 2025

Most Read of the Week

spot_img

Latest Articles

The Literary Representation of Pathological Love: Dependent Relationships in Tolstoy’s Anna Karenina

Love is one of the most powerful and transformative human experiences. However, in some cases, it becomes more than an emotional bond-manifesting instead as a complex psychological state involving control, fear of abandonment, and dependency. In psychology, such cases are often referred to as “obsessive love” or “pathological love.” These relationships are marked by an excessive emotional investment in the other person, to the point where the loved one becomes central to the individual’s sense of identity and existence (Young, 2005).

Lev Tolstoy’s Anna Karenina serves as a compelling literary example of how obsessive love can lead to profound psychological disintegration.

Anna, the protagonist, is a respected married woman in Russian high society. However, her encounter with the young officer Vronsky marks a radical turning point in her life. What begins as mutual attraction soon becomes a psychological dependency. She abandons her family, child, and social position for this relationship, investing all her emotional energy in Vronsky. Anna’s own words— “Happiness is not something that comes from outside. We must carry it within ourselves. I always looked for it outside” (Tolstoy, 2000, p. 423) -clearly reflect her attempt to fill an inner void through an external figure.

From a psychological perspective, Anna’s emotional pattern can be understood through attachment theory, particularly the concept of anxious attachment. According to Bowlby (1988), the attachment styles formed in early childhood significantly shape adult romantic relationships. Individuals with anxious attachment styles tend to seek intense closeness, constantly crave reassurance, and experience heightened sensitivity to signs of rejection or abandonment.

Anna’s question, “If he doesn’t love me, what will become of me?” exemplifies how her love is deeply tied to her sense of self-worth and existential security.

Over time, Vronsky ceases to be simply a romantic partner for Anna and instead becomes a psychological lifeline. This dynamic aligns with what clinical psychology refers to as emotional dependency-a condition where one relies excessively on a partner’s attention and affection to maintain emotional equilibrium (Young, 2005). As Anna becomes increasingly dependent, her behavior shifts into patterns of jealousy, emotional dysregulation, and depressive withdrawal.

Joe Wright’s (2012) film adaptation of Anna Karenina powerfully captures this inner disintegration through visual narrative. The film’s theatrical staging suggests that Anna’s world has become a performance-a blurred space between inner reality and social expectation. Scenes in which she stands alone amidst crowds visually symbolize her growing isolation and dissociation. Meanwhile, Vronsky’s emotional restraint highlights the imbalance in the relationship, intensifying Anna’s psychological vulnerability.

The line, “It’s not enough for you to tell me you love me. I have to feel it every moment, or I’ll die,” starkly reveals the existential dependency that defines her version of love.

Tolstoy portrays Anna’s eventual suicide not only as a tragic conclusion to a doomed romance but as the symbolic collapse of a self that had lost its inner foundation. Her final words— “God, forgive me! Everything is over…” -speak to the loss not just of love, but of personal identity and emotional coherence (Tolstoy, 2000).

Ultimately, Anna Karenina is not simply a story of forbidden passion. It is a psychological portrait of how distorted love, when rooted in insecurity and emotional emptiness, can consume a person from within. Healthy romantic relationships require mutual respect, emotional boundaries, and a stable sense of self. When an individual defines their existence solely through another’s affection, love can devolve into obsession and emotional trauma.

In this regard, Tolstoy’s novel stands as a powerful example of how literature and psychology can intersect-revealing not only what love is, but also what it must not become.

References

  • Bowlby, J. (1988). A Secure Base: Parent-Child Attachment and Healthy Human Development. Basic Books.

  • Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511

  • Tolstoy, L. (2000). Anna Karenina (R. Pevear & L. Volokhonsky, Trans.). Penguin Classics. (Original work published 1877)

  • Wright, J. (Director). (2012). Anna Karenina [Film]. Focus Features.

  • Young, S. M. (2005). The neurobiology of obsessive love. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 28(3), 671–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psc.2005.02.005

Melis Kümbetlioğlu
Melis Kümbetlioğlu
Melis Kümbetlioğlu is a psychologist and author who graduated from the Psychology Department of Bilkent University and completed a specialization in Attachment Studies at Roehampton University in London. She conducts studies on early attachment relationships and art therapy, sharing the therapeutic power of art through her writings and workshops. In her book Yüreğimden Dökülenler (What Pours From My Heart), she sincerely presents her inner journey and therapeutic experiences. Kümbetlioğlu continues her work to integrate attachment theory and art therapy into individuals’ lives and to develop a healing language.

Popular Articles