Sunday, February 15, 2026

Most Read of the Week

spot_img

Latest Articles

On Giving Up: The Pain Of Staying And The Freedom Of Leaving

Giving up is often associated with failure, weakness, giving in, or losing. Yet from a psychological perspective, the ability to give up is an active process that requires awareness, insight, and ego integrity. It is not merely a rupture, but often a healthy redirection.

So, what is your relationship with giving up? When do we realize what, whom, or which dream we are holding onto? And more importantly, how do we know when it is time to let go?

A person leaves behind not only hope, but also effort, dreams, attachments, and often a part of their identity. For this reason, giving up is not a simple decision, but a profound psychological experience.

Human beings are creatures of attachment. While some bonds are nourishing, others are filled with conflict, crises, and inner negotiations. A relationship, a job, a dream, or an identity… Giving up is not only separating from an external object, but also from the meaning, expectations, and the part of the self that was built around it.

What Is Your Relationship With Giving Up?

Individuals’ attitudes toward giving up are closely related to early attachment experiences and self-concept. For some, giving up means “becoming worthless,” while for others, it is the only way to survive.

Especially in battles fought alone, people often cling to the thought, “If I endure a little longer, it will get better.” However, in psychology, effort is not always healing; unsustainable effort turns into burnout. In areas where we constantly strive but receive no return, struggle becomes a one-sided war.

The intense anxiety, feeling of being trapped, guilt, and suppressed anger experienced when we cannot leave manifest not only mentally but also through bodily signals. Chronic headaches, gastrointestinal problems, muscle tension, and sleep disturbances may be the body’s call saying, “It’s time to go.” In the psychological literature, this is defined as emotional overload expressed through somatization (APA, 2022).

Battles fought alone eventually lead to exhaustion. The critical question here is:

“Is this effort helping me grow, or is it consuming me?”

Not Giving Up Is Not About Them, It’s About You

Being unable to give up on a relationship, a job, or a dream is often not about the object itself, but about the individual’s inner needs. The thought “What will happen if I am without them?” is actually another way of asking, “Am I enough on my own?”

At this point, the distinction between attachment and dependency becomes clear.

Attachment is the ability to remain in a relationship while preserving autonomy.
Dependency, on the other hand, is the transfer of identity and sense of worth to the other.

An important psychological reality is this: What we are dependent on is not the object itself. In other words, a person is not dependent on a relationship, but on the fear of abandonment, a schema of worthlessness, or loneliness (Young et al., 2003).

Is Giving Up Defeat, Or Is It Reclaiming Yourself?

Giving up often triggers the thought, “I lost.” Yet psychologically, giving up is the ability to withdraw from the wrong battlefield.

If a process has already ended and the person still remains there, this is explained in the literature as the sunk cost fallacy, also known as the Concorde Fallacy.

The Concorde Fallacy refers to the tendency to continue an unproductive or harmful situation due to past investments (time, effort, emotion). Being unable to give up despite harm is not rational, but the product of emotional attachment (Arkes & Blumer, 1985). Psychologically, this is fueled by the belief, “If I quit, it will all have been for nothing.” Yet past costs cannot be recovered; decisions should be made based on present and future well-being.

Closely related to this is the Endowment Effect, which refers to people valuing what they own more than its objective worth. The possibility of loss is psychologically more powerful than potential gain. Therefore, people struggle to let go of things that harm them (Kahneman, Knetsch, & Thaler, 1991).

The Comfort Zone And The Cost Of Change

The comfort zone is not always safe; it is merely familiar. Giving up means stepping into uncertainty. For this reason, the mind prefers to stay where it knows, even if it hurts. However, psychological growth often begins outside this zone.

During the process of giving up, individuals may experience tears, intense sadness, a need for solitude, and occasional urges to return. These reactions are not pathological; they are human and expected. What matters is being able to wait without forcing the transition from struggle to acceptance.

Giving Up Is A Grieving Process

When we give up on a relationship, a job, or a dream, we are actually grieving. Grief is not limited to death; it is experienced for every meaningful loss.

Kübler-Ross’s (1969) five stages of grief are frequently observed in this process:

  1. Denial: “It’s not that bad.”

  2. Anger: “Why me?”

  3. Bargaining: “If I endure a little longer…”

  4. Depression: Hopelessness and withdrawal.

  5. Acceptance: Contact with reality and a new direction.

These stages do not have to be linear; individuals may move back and forth between them. Allowing oneself time, seeking social support, and permitting solitude support a healthy process.

“Acceptance is not giving up; it is coming into contact with reality.”

In the process of letting go, sometimes what is required is not to fight, but to stop fighting and wait for acceptance.

What If It Has Already Ended?

This is one of the hardest questions. Sometimes what we cannot give up has already ended; we simply prolong the pain by postponing the farewell.

A reality frequently observed in psychotherapy is this: People often resist not the ending, but the goodbye.

Giving up is not always a loss. Sometimes it is laying down a burden. Sometimes it is being able to say, “I choose myself now.”

When Should We Consider Giving Up?

  • If the struggle is one-sided

  • If the body is constantly in alarm

  • If it conflicts with your values

  • If hope has turned into fear

  • If the expectation of “things going back to how they were” erases the present

There is no single answer to the question of when we should give up; however, the point where the body, emotions, and reality converge offers a clue.

Giving up is sometimes not losing, but reclaiming yourself. Continuing something that has already ended is not courage; it is often fear. Not everything we fight for has to be permanent. Sometimes the healthiest step is to leave.

References

American Psychiatric Association. (2022). DSM-5-TR: Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. APA Publishing.

Arkes, H. R., & Blumer, C. (1985). The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35(1), 124–140.

Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1991). Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 193–206.

Young, J. E., Klosko, J. S., & Weishaar, M. (2003). Schema therapy: A practitioner’s guide. Guilford Press.

Umay Şeyda Yılmaz
Umay Şeyda Yılmaz
Umay Şeyda Yılmaz completed her undergraduate education in Psychology at Eastern Mediterranean University. She has received training in Individual Behavioral Therapy, Sports Psychology, Mindfulness-Based Therapy, Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), Child and Adolescent Therapy, Adult Therapy, and Family and Couples Therapy. She has participated in Positive Psychology and Guidance Clinical internship programs. After her undergraduate studies, she worked for a period at a private education center with children with intellectual disabilities, autism, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), as well as individuals over the age of 18. In this field, she had the opportunity to closely observe the developmental processes of children. She has also been involved in sessions with young adults, observing personality disorders and antisocial relationships. She has worked with individuals on stress management and anger control using mindfulness techniques. She has created, and continues to create, content on individual, societal, family, and romantic relationships by leveraging the spreadability potential of social media, the speed of information flow, and its power to change perceptions. Guided by the belief that effective therapy methods should be individualized and vary from person to person, she has completed extensive training and continues to develop herself with the aim of providing mental health support built on trust. She aims to communicate psychology in a more accessible and understandable way for individuals of all age groups.

Popular Articles