Saturday, April 4, 2026

Most Read of the Week

spot_img

Latest Articles

Can Anyone Commit A Crime Under Difficult Circumstances?

Conditions, Choices, and Human Nature

Imagine a father standing in a cold, dark corner of a harbor, with not a single coin in his pocket and having not eaten for days. Now imagine him stealing a loaf of bread from a bakery. Is this man a “criminal,” or is he “desperate”? Society often rushes to label him: “Thief.” However, when we dive into the deeper waters of psychology, the layers beneath that label confront us with a striking question: If the right conditions—or the wrong misfortunes—came together, would you have stolen that bread too?

Most of us believe our moral compass is unshakable. We define ourselves as “good” people and build a thick wall between us and those we label as “bad.” Yet psychology shows us that this wall is much thinner than we think.

Does The Person Change When The Situation Changes?

To understand human behavior, we must first consider the concept of situational influence. This concept tells us that who you are is not the only factor that matters—where you are and the conditions you are under are equally important. Life can push you to a point where everything you once said “never” to suddenly becomes an option.

For instance, when the life of a loved one is at stake or when a person is caught in an extreme survival struggle, the brain begins to function differently. The prefrontal cortex, which normally governs rational decision-making, may hand over control to more primitive brain systems under intense stress and fear. In such moments, decisions are no longer a matter of “weak character” but rather a biological attempt at survival.

Zimbardo’s Guards: Who Is The Monster?

One of the most striking pieces of evidence on this topic comes from the Stanford Prison Experiment conducted in 1971. Psychologist Philip Zimbardo gathered psychologically healthy university students with no criminal history and randomly assigned them to roles as “prisoners” or “guards.”

The results were unsettling: within just a few days, the same kind and ordinary students began to change. Those assigned as guards, feeling a sense of authority, started to psychologically abuse the prisoners. The experiment had to be terminated early because it spiraled out of control. Zimbardo’s conclusion was clear: if you place ordinary people in oppressive, unjust, and unregulated environments, those environments can bring out their darker sides. He called this the Lucifer Effect. In other words, sometimes the real culprit is not the individual, but the conditions surrounding them.

Broken Windows: How Environment Invites Crime

Not only people, but also our physical environments influence how we behave. A concept later known as the Broken Windows Theory explains this simply: if a single window in a building is broken and left unrepaired, it sends a message—“no one cares, there is no order here.” Soon, all the windows end up broken.

The same applies to crime. A neglected neighborhood, a street where rules are not enforced, or a society where justice is not upheld sends the message that “wrongdoing is acceptable here.” In such an environment, a person may commit an act they would normally avoid, simply because of this sense of disorder. Broken windows are not just physical—they reflect the moral condition of a society.

Social Pressure: The Illusion Of “Everyone Is Doing It”

As human beings, we value belonging to a group almost as much as survival. For this reason, when we are part of a group, we may suspend our personal sense of right and wrong and follow the crowd. An individual within a group may commit acts they would never dare to do alone, driven by the desire for social acceptance. The belief that “if everyone is doing it, it must not be wrong” can dissolve personal conscience within the crowd.

Why Do Some People Still Say “No”?

So why doesn’t everyone commit crimes under difficult conditions? This is where individual internal structures and protective mechanisms come into play. Psychology highlights several key factors that act as safeguards against crime:

  1. The Strength of Empathy: For someone who can truly feel another person’s pain, committing a crime becomes much harder. Empathy is one of the strongest inhibitors of wrongdoing.

  2. Moral Identity: A strong self-concept such as “I am an honest person” provides an anchor, even in the most difficult moments.

  3. Social Support: If a person has loved ones or a social circle they do not want to disappoint, they are far less likely to take the risks associated with crime.

Where Should We Look To Prevent Crime?

Attributing crime solely to an individual’s lack of morality is to see only a small part of the picture. Crime can be the result of desperation, environmental pressure, or systemic failures. If we truly want to reduce crime rates, increasing punishments alone is not enough. We must first fix the “broken windows.” This means providing people with hope, education, equal opportunities, and justice. In a society where individuals feel safe and do not fear for their future, the pathways to crime naturally begin to narrow.

Final Thought: Looking In The Mirror

Let us return to the father standing in front of the bakery. If you were in his place, and the life of someone you loved depended on that loaf of bread, what would you do? Saying “I would never do that” is easy from the comfort of our lives. But Zimbardo’s guards and those broken-window buildings remind us that we should not be so certain.

Human nature is neither entirely black nor entirely white; we are shades of gray, shaped by the environments we inhabit and the pressures we face. Perhaps the real task is not to judge one another, but to build a world where such desperate situations no longer exist.

References

Burcu Kara
Burcu Kara
Burcu Kara was born on February 29, 2004. She is currently studying Psychology in English at Istanbul Medipol University and Sociology at Istanbul University. She has contributed as a guest writer for Psikopol magazine, prioritizing a scientific approach in her articles. She completed an internship at Rehber Klinik, focusing on CBT, sports psychology, mindfulness, and art psychology. She is a board member of the Medipol Cognitive Neuroscience Society and plays an active role in the Medipol Career Office. Burcu is a member of the “biZ farkı” team, contributing to content development in the psychometric test project. Additionally, she actively participates in volunteer projects with TOG and Yeşilay. She also serves actively in AIESEC, an international leadership and exchange program.

Popular Articles