Sunday, February 22, 2026

Most Read of the Week

spot_img

Latest Articles

Children Drawn Into Crime: Offender Or Victim?

When a child becomes involved in a crime, we often focus on the outcome.
Yet when it comes to children, understanding the outcome requires looking at the process.
The real question is not what the child did, but how and under what conditions they arrived at this point.

Childhood and adolescence are among the most fragile stages of human development. The support that is provided or withheld during these periods shapes not only a child’s present circumstances, but also their future life trajectory. When criminal behavior is involved, the issue cannot be reduced to an individual act alone; it is the product of a complex interaction between family, environment, society, and systemic structures.

For this reason, the expression “a child who commits a crime” often tells only part of the story. Many children do not encounter crime as a conscious or deliberate choice, but rather as a consequence of conditions that gradually push them toward it.

Child And Adolescent Psychology: What Do We Overlook?

Children and adolescents do not possess the same cognitive and emotional capacities as adults. Particularly during adolescence:

  • Impulse control is still developing.

  • Risk-taking tendencies are heightened.

  • Peer approval may outweigh individual judgment.

  • Conflict with authority becomes a natural part of identity formation.

These developmental characteristics can make it difficult for children to clearly distinguish between “right” and “wrong” in the same way adults do. This does not justify criminal behavior; however, it clearly demonstrates why judging children without attempting to understand them is problematic.

When evaluating a child’s behavior, it is essential to look not only at the outcome, but also at the path that led to it. A child psychology perspective reminds us that developmental limitations significantly shape behavior.

What Does “A Child Drawn Into Crime” Mean?

The term “a child drawn into crime” is not chosen arbitrarily. It reflects the reality that children are often not active perpetrators, but rather passive subjects shaped by their circumstances.

Research shows that a significant proportion of children drawn into crime are exposed to similar risk factors, including:

  • Domestic violence or neglect

  • Poverty and social exclusion

  • Disengagement from education

  • Traumatic life experiences

  • Lack of secure attachment figures

For a child growing up under such conditions, crime may appear as an escape route, a means of belonging, or even a strategy for survival. At times, criminal behavior represents an attempt to be seen or heard; at other times, it becomes the only response available to unmet needs.

The Invisible Harm Of Labeling

One of the most common mistakes societies make is labeling children at an early age. Descriptions such as “problematic,” “dangerous,” or “criminal” often overshadow the child’s identity and reduce them to a single act.

From a psychological perspective, this refers to a process in which the identity attributed to the child is gradually internalized over time. When a child internalizes the identity imposed upon them, their behavior may gradually align with those expectations. As a result, what might have been a temporary experience can turn into a lasting pattern of behavior.

For children, the most healing realization is understanding that their mistakes do not define who they are.

Offender Or Victim? A Necessary But Difficult Balance

At this point, an important distinction must be made. Recognizing a child as a victim of circumstances does not mean disregarding the harm caused by their actions. The rights of victims remain a fundamental component of justice and must not be ignored.

However, when the individual involved is a child, justice cannot be limited to punishment alone. A purely punitive approach prevents meaningful engagement with the roots of the problem.

True justice neither romanticizes the offense nor treats the child as an adult. It acknowledges responsibility while taking into account developmental limitations and lived conditions. A sustainable juvenile justice system must balance accountability with developmental understanding.

Where Does Social Responsibility Begin?

Explaining juvenile crime solely through individual factors offers an incomplete picture. A more critical question must be asked: What was offered to this child, and what was withheld?

Access to education, psychological support, safe social environments, and inclusive social policies are among the strongest protective factors against juvenile delinquency. Preventive approaches are consistently more effective than punitive ones.

A system that evaluates children only by what they have done often avoids confronting its own role in shaping those outcomes.

What Should Be Done?

When working with children drawn into crime, the primary goal should be healing rather than punishment. This requires strengthening psychological support systems, expanding family-centered interventions, and identifying educational disengagement at an early stage.

Juvenile justice systems grounded in rehabilitation rather than retribution offer a more sustainable and humane path forward.

Losing a child to crime is not merely an individual tragedy; it is a societal failure.

Final Thoughts

Before discussing the crime a child has committed, we must ask under what conditions they were raised, what they encountered, and where they were left unsupported. Childhood is a stage of life that deserves second chances.

Perhaps the most important question is this:

What do we expect from children, and what are we truly willing to offer them?

Tuğba Tosun Çobanoğlu
Tuğba Tosun Çobanoğlu
Tuğba Tosun Çobanoğlu is a researcher and writer who conducts interdisciplinary work in the fields of writing, psychology, and social sciences. Following her undergraduate studies in Business Administration, Law, and Sociology, she completed a Master’s degree in Forensic Sciences and a PhD in Political Science. Her first book, Legitimacy of Defense in International Law, has been published, and her second book in the field of psychology, Mind Labyrinths, is currently in press. She continues to write on psychology and human behavior through her personal blog titled Human States and on various platforms. She serves as a Mediator and Sworn Social Conciliator under the General Directorate of Criminal Affairs at the Ministry of Justice. At the same time, she conducts psychology-based work as a Family Counselor. She holds an expert witness certification and has received training in forensic psychology. She is a member of various associations operating in the field of psychology and is also a United Nations volunteer. In addition to Turkish, she speaks English and German at a native level, Albanian at an advanced level, and French at a basic level. She holds both Turkish and German citizenship.

Popular Articles