Addiction is no longer confined to substances like alcohol or heroin. It has seeped into the everyday textures of modern life. According to Stanford psychiatrist Anna Lembke’s argument in Dopamine Nation: Finding Balance in the Age of Indulgence, a new era of compulsive actions has emerged as a result of the digital age’s limitless supply of dopamine-producing stimuli. From social media to shopping, pornography to video games, our brains are being rewired to desire quick satisfaction, making us more nervous and hooked than ever.
Lembke’s argument essentially revolves around the pleasure–pain balance. The opponent-process theory, in short, says that there is, for any act, whether psychological or physiological, an opposing bodily reaction (Solomon, 1980). Translated to addiction, the thought is that when we engage in something pleasurable, we get dopamine released and shift the balance to the pleasure side. But the brain, seeking equilibrium, soon provides a counterbalance: a subtle state of pain or discomfort after the initial euphoria wears off.
This counterweight gets stronger, and the pleasure response weakens with repeated exposure. Long-lasting craving or dissatisfaction is the result of the brain adjusting by lowering its baseline dopamine levels. This explains why someone who used to enjoy one glass of wine suddenly needs three, or why someone who used to check Instagram once an hour is now compelled to browse through it compulsively.
Lembke (2021) explains this dynamic vividly. Every pleasure comes with a cost. The brain craves equilibrium, and the more that is indulged, the more pain rebounds as retribution. In clinical practice, she sees this pattern in patients addicted not only to drugs but also to gaming, pornography, shopping, or even romance novels. In all cases, the neurobiological trap is the same: short-term pleasure leads to long-term suffering, and the process self-repeats into addiction.
This pleasure–pain seesaw revises addiction away from being an issue of failing moral character and towards being an issue of how the brain works. The greater the striving for pleasure, the farther the balance shifts away from pleasure and tilts towards pain. Recovery is therefore less about willpower and more about rebalancing through abstinence, self-binding, and healthier mechanisms of dopamine regulation (Lembke, 2021).
1. Abstinence
Lembke (2021) illustrates that abstinence from addictive behaviors provides the brain space to recalibrate its pleasure–pain balance. As people stop using drugs that stimulate dopamine, painful emotions and sensations cannot help but surface. Instead of avoiding those sensations, the key is to tolerate them. She expresses that learning how to remain in distress makes suffering “communal rather than entirely personal, adding a richer, more textured pattern to life” (Lembke, 2021, p. 237).
The paradox of abstinence is that suffering intensifies before it recedes. But if tolerated long enough, the brain resets its balance, and ordinary pleasures such as conversation, food, or time in nature regain their vibrancy. Rather than deprivation, abstinence becomes a process of rediscovery: a way to reclaim sustainable joy in everyday life.
2. Self-Binding
Borrowing from behavioral economics, Lembke (2021) describes self-binding as the deliberate creation of external barriers against temptation. Humans are notoriously poor at resisting instant gratification in the heat of the moment. By setting up constraints in advance, individuals make their future selves less vulnerable.
Self-binding takes different forms. Physical self-binding involves removing or limiting access to the addictive stimulus. For example, removing social media apps, not having alcohol in the house, or using a website blocker shrinks the physical opportunity to indulge; thus, individuals rely less on sheer willpower.
In contrast, chronological self-binding uses time as a constraint. This takes the form of establishing specific “windows” of time for specific behavior (e.g., drinking during only specific days of the week) or delaying access long enough to allow urges to dissipate. By structuring time formally, people reduce the likelihood of an impulsive decision.
3. Hormesis
Hormesis is the principle that small, controlled doses of stress make the body and brain stronger. The author, Lembke (2021), posits that rather than constantly pursuing comfort, individuals can willingly subject themselves to manageable discomfort as an alternative, and a healthier way of activating the dopamine system. Examples are cold-water immersion, fasting, exercise, or deliberate digital detoxes.
Each of these activities imposes short-term discomfort, but in turn, they trigger dopamine release more gradually and sustainably. The high of substances or behaviors is very immediate and crashes just as fast. Hormetic practices do not work that way; they have a delayed effect but sustain the feeling of well-being. They work by initiating the body’s stress-response systems so that when these systems reset, they do so to a stronger baseline. In terms of neuroscience, this is akin to “pressing on the pain side of the balance,” which paradoxically encourages the brain to tilt back towards the pleasure side.
4. Honesty and Connection
Perhaps the most human part of Lembke’s approach is her emphasis on radical honesty: being honest about one’s struggles, even shameful ones. Addiction thrives on denial, where the person downplays or conceals the magnitude of their problem, from others and themselves. Denial sets up a vicious circle: the more one conceals, the further entrenched and isolated the addiction becomes.
Breaking denial requires a willingness to accept the reality of one’s behavior and its consequences. Lembke (2021) argues that honesty is the first step towards cultivating such an awareness. When patients openly acknowledge their struggles, they move from concealment to connection, opening themselves up to an understanding not only of their compulsions but also to the underlying emotional suffering that drives them.
Honesty also taps into a powerful social process: prosocial shame. Unlike toxic shame, which isolates and destroys self-esteem, prosocial shame arises when individuals reveal their vulnerabilities in a compassionate community, such as a therapy group or recovery program. Instead of judgment, people receive empathy, accountability, and belonging. That transforms shame into a positive force, one that encourages responsibility without rejection.
As Lembke (2021) describes it, patients who practice radical honesty often develop authentic intimacy, which in and of itself generates dopamine rushes, but in a way that is sustainable and healthy and tied to human connection rather than consumption. Honesty in this sense not only breaks the denial cycle but also replaces the artificial highs of addiction with the deeper rewards of trust, accountability, and shared humanity.
References
-
Lembke, A. (2021). Dopamine Nation: Finding Balance in the Age of Indulgence. Dutton.
-
Solomon, R.L. (1980). The Opponent-Process Theory of Acquired Motivation: The Costs of Pleasure and the Benefits of Pain. American Psychologist, 35(8), pp. 691–712.