In today’s interconnected world, platforms like Instagram and WhatsApp have become integral to how couples communicate, express emotions, and maintain closeness. However, alongside these conveniences arise new challenges—particularly in maintaining trust within romantic relationships.
From a psychological perspective, John Bowlby’s (1969) attachment theory provides a meaningful lens for understanding these digital dynamics. According to Bowlby, early relationships with caregivers shape the attachment models that continue into adulthood, influencing how individuals give and receive love, handle separation, and establish trust.
Attachment Styles And Trust In Relationships
Attachment styles serve as internal templates that determine how individuals perceive safety, closeness, and dependency in relationships.
-
Secure attachment: Individuals with secure attachment tend to trust their partners, maintain emotional balance, and feel at ease with intimacy.
-
Anxious attachment: Characterized by fear of abandonment, constant need for reassurance, and emotional hypervigilance.
-
Avoidant attachment: Defined by discomfort with closeness and a preference for independence, often leading to emotional withdrawal.
These attachment styles profoundly shape how trust is established, maintained, or eroded in romantic relationships.
Research shows that those who experience consistent, responsive caregiving in childhood are more likely to develop a secure sense of trust in adulthood. Conversely, neglect or rejection during early development can create insecure patterns that make trusting others difficult. Thus, trust in a partner is not solely a reaction to external behaviors—it reflects one’s internalized attachment models.
Social Media And The Psychology Of Trust
Recent studies have explored how social media use impacts romantic trust.
In Başak Dinçsoy’s (2018) master’s thesis, higher levels of social media addiction were linked to lower levels of trust in relationships. Additionally, a strong positive correlation was found between trust and relationship satisfaction—couples who trusted each other reported greater emotional stability.
Other research indicates that online interactions can trigger jealousy, insecurity, and controlling behaviors. While social media facilitates emotional expression and connection, it can also amplify uncertainty and fear of betrayal, especially when partners misinterpret digital cues.
Attachment Styles And Digital Vulnerability
Attachment styles play a crucial role in understanding how individuals react to the emotional ambiguities of online communication.
-
Anxious attachment:
These individuals are highly sensitive to digital silence. An unanswered message or reduced online activity can evoke intense anxiety. They often seek reassurance through visible signs of the relationship—such as sharing couple photos or monitoring their partner’s activity. However, excessive checking or controlling behaviors may lead to conflict and emotional distance. -
Avoidant attachment:
Avoidantly attached individuals often use digital boundaries as a form of protection. They may avoid constant texting, respond slowly, or restrict online interaction to preserve autonomy. For them, social media becomes a space to maintain emotional independence, rather than intimacy.
Research supports these patterns. Anxiously attached individuals use social media to reduce fear of rejection and gain validation (through likes or feedback), while avoidantly attached individuals engage less frequently and prefer direct communication.
For instance, an anxious person may frequently post about the relationship to seek reassurance, while an avoidant partner may find such visibility overwhelming.
Digital Jealousy And The Culture Of Surveillance
The digital age has intensified emotional vulnerabilities that once remained hidden.
Online behaviors—viewing old photos with ex-partners, gaining new followers, or checking “last seen” timestamps—can trigger jealousy and distrust. This has given rise to what psychologists call digital surveillance: the compulsive monitoring of a partner’s online activity.
However, rather than fostering security, these behaviors often erode trust. The more one checks, the more doubt grows, creating a cycle of insecurity and emotional detachment.
From a psychological standpoint, these patterns stem from deeper attachment needs. For anxiously attached individuals, social media is both comforting and distressing—it keeps them connected, but also fuels anxiety when digital cues change. For avoidantly attached individuals, it offers a safe escape from closeness, allowing emotional distance under the guise of autonomy.
Building Trust In The Digital Age
Ultimately, attachment styles remain central to understanding romantic trust—both offline and online.
As digital communication becomes inseparable from daily life, attachment behaviors are expressed through online habits: messaging frequency, visibility, content sharing, and even silence. Social media can strengthen emotional bonds when used consciously and transparently. Yet, dependence on digital validation or constant monitoring weakens trust over time.
Maintaining trust in the digital age requires:
-
Self-awareness of one’s attachment style
-
Open dialogue about digital boundaries
-
Balanced engagement with social media
By transforming awareness into action, couples can navigate the online world without sacrificing emotional intimacy or security.
References
-
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and Loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. Basic Books.
-
Dinçsoy, B. (2018). Sosyal medya bağımlılığı ile ilişki doyumu arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi [Master’s thesis].
-
Sullivan, K. T., Ramos-Sánchez, L., & McDonald, R. M. (2015). Attachment style, social media use, and interpersonal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32(7), 1015–1036.
-
D’Arienzo, M. C., Boursier, V., & Griffiths, M. D. (2019). Addiction to social media and attachment styles: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 17, 1094–1118.
-
Utz, S., & Beukeboom, C. J. (2011). The role of social network sites in romantic relationships: Effects on jealousy and relationship happiness. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16(4), 511–527.